How are conflicting definitions between different federal legislation treated or resolved?

The definitions provided as part of a bill – proposed law – only apply to that particular bill. They do not define a word or term for all laws passed by the Australian Parliament. This means that if another law provides a different definition, there is no conflict as it only applies within the context of that law.

However, if two pieces of legislation on the same topic have conflicting meanings for a word or term, a court may be asked to decide upon the meaning. The court can refer to a variety of sources, including the common meaning and parliamentary debates, to ensure their interpretation is consistent with the intention of the law.

This image shows excerpts from a bill introduced into the Australian Parliament.

Parts of a bill.

Parliamentary Education Office (peo.gov.au)

Parts of a bill.

This image shows excerpts from a bill introduced into the Australian Parliament.

Parliamentary Education Office (peo.gov.au)

Description

This image shows the different sections of a bill. The top third shows the bill title and year. The middle third shows an excerpt from bill clauses and sub-clauses. The bottom third shows excerpts from bill definitions.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

You are free to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work.

Attribution – you must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).

Non-commercial – you may not use this work for commercial purposes.

No derivative works – you may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.

Waiver – any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder.